THE SYDNEY SIEGE WAS ALL PART OF THE OVERALL PLAN BY BY TREASONOUS AUSTRALIANS TO EVENTUALLY SUBMERGE AUSTRALIA INTO EITHER CIVIL WAR, OR WWIII, WITH THEIR ULTIMATE GOAL BEING THE SO-CALLED "NEW WORLD ORDER."
THIS SIEGE WAS ALLOWED, EVEN SECRETLY CULTIVATED, BY PERSONS IN SECRET SOCIETIES IN HIGH PLACES IN AUSTRALIA, BEHIND THE SCENES, IN THE POLITICAL, LEGAL, POLICE, JUDICIARY AND OTHER BUREAUCRACIES. IT COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED OTHERWISE. IT IS GLARINGLY OBVIOUS THAT THIS MUSLIM WAS FREED DELIBERATELY BECAUSE BECAUSE IT WAS INEVITABLE THAT HE WOULD COMMIT MURDER AND/OR SOME ATROCITY SOMEWHERE IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE. NO JUDICIARY OR OTHER ORGANISATION COULD BE SO STUPID AS TO THINK OTHERWISE. IT IS THEY WHO SHOULD BE IN JAIL!
IT'S ANOTHER MINI 9/11, ANOTHER PEARL HARBOUR, ANOTHER USS LIBERTY, ANOTHER PORT ARTHUR, ETC. ETC.
'The individual is handicapped coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists'. J.Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI.
"I gladly acknowledge the debt of my own government to Fabianism. The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism, the abolition of private property, in this case to own land. They then align themselves with the non-violent arm of Marxism by accepting the non-violent road of patient gradualism to total government."
Bob Hawke, former Labor government Prime Minister of Australia, in his speech to the Fabian Society in Melbourne on the 8th May 1984.
“For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did, most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes to strike, you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or all your waiting will be in vain and fruitless.”
Further statement of Bob Hawke, Prime Minister, to the Fabian Society, 1984
"The high office of the president has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizens of this plight." President John F. Kennedy, November 12, 1963, shortly before he was assassinated from the grassy knoll, with Lee Oswald being the patsy, then shot at point blank by Jack Ruby (Rubenstein), thereby killing off all enquiries.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
Marcus Tulius Cicero, 42 B.C.
"Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." President Woodrow Wilson
December 15, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - LD) As predicted, the suspect amid the "Sydney Siege," has long been on the radar of Australian law enforcement, as well as a frequent visitor to Australia's court system.
Before that, however, he came to Australia as a political refugee, an opponent of what he called the "Iranian regime," and was even interviewed by Australia's ABC network in 2001 as part of an ongoing anti-Iranian propaganda campaign.
It has been revealed that long-time agitator, alias "Man Haron Monis," also known as "Manteghi Boroujerdi," was the suspect amid the so-called "Sydney Siege" hostage crisis. Monis/Boroujerdi claims to be a Shia'a religious leader and is often seen in press photos dressed as one.
Despite this, he was at the center of a hostage crisis requesting the flag of the "Islamic State" terrorist organization be delivered to him while claiming association with other ISIS "brothers."
Neither Islamic nor a state, ISIS is led by US, Israeli, and Saudi-backed Wahabi terrorists, promoting a perversion of Sunni Islam - the bane to both genuine Sunnis and Shia'a worldwide and against which both the nations of Syria and Iran are fighting.
Monis/Boroujerdi rose to infamy amid two notable incidents - one being his involvement in the stabbing death and burning of his ex-wife - the other being his controversial campaign of sending hate-letters to the families of dead Australian soldiers killed during the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. The latter was used extensively to stir up division across the pro and anti-war political divide.
The Australian in a September 2013 article titled, "'Cleric' Man Haron Monis punished for offensive letters written to ...," reported that:
A SELF-styled Muslim cleric has been sentenced to 300 hours of community service for penning "grossly offensive" letters to families of soldiers killed in Afghanistan.
Man Haron Monis, also known as Sheik Haron, was also placed on a two-year good behaviour bond.
So too was his co-accused and partner, 34-year-old Amirah Droudis, who pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting him.
In December of 2013, the Australian Daily Telegraph would report in an article titled, "'Hate' sheik Man Horan Monis and girlfriend Amirzh Droudis granted ...," that:
Monis is charged as an accessory before and after the fact to the murder of Noleen Hayson Pal, 30, who was stabbed 18 times and set alight outside a western Sydney unit in April.
Monis/Boroujerdi's Origins Story
But before Monis/Boroujerdi's recent run-ins with the law and his role as chief "Muslim boogeyman" in Australia, he was "Manteghi Boroujerdi," a "victim" of the "Iranian regime" who was in love with Western society.
Australia's ABC in its "Religion Report" dated January 31, 2001, introduced Monis/Boroujerdi as follows:
...while in Sydney we talk to Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi, an Iranian cleric espousing a liberal brand of Islam - dangerously liberal, as his views have led to his wife and two daughters being held hostage in Iran.
The interview itself is used as yet another vehicle to carry along Western propaganda long-aimed at Iran. It claims Monis/Boroujerdi's family is in grave danger and that Monis/Boroujerdi himself would be executed should he ever return to Iran. It quotes Monis/Boroujerdi several times including claims he was formally associated with Iranian intelligence:
In Iran, mostly I have been involved with the Ministry of Intelligence and Security.
And was in contact with the UN regarding security issues in Iran:
...more than four years I have not seen my family, and the Iranian regime doesn't let them come out. In fact I can say they are hostage; as a hostage the Iranian regime wants to make me silent, because I have some secret information about government, and about their terrorist operations in the war. I sent a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and somebody on behalf of Mr Kofi Anan sent the answer, and they want to do something. I have hope and always I pray and ask God to solve my problem.
At one point during the interview Monis/Boroujerdi professes his love of Australia, Canada, the US, and UK claiming:
...we can say Australia, Canada, England, USA, so many western countries, they are religious societies. They don't say 'We are religious', but in fact the spirit of religion, we can see the spirit of religion in these societies. And some other countries in the Middle East, in Asia, they say 'We are Islamic' they have a name of Islamic, but in fact they are not religious societies and religious governments. Whenever I walk in the street, whenever I go out in Australia, I feel I am in a real religious society. I don't want to say it is perfect, we don't have a perfect society on the earth, but when we compare, if we compare Australia with Iran and other countries in the Middle East, we can say it is heaven.
However, later in 2008, Monis/Boroujerdi's activities drew the attention of real Shia'a religious leaders in Australia who asked Australian security agents to investigate him. In an Australian article titled, "Call to probe mystery Shia cleric," it was reported that:
FEDERAL agents have been urged by the nation's senior Shia leader, Kamal Mousselmani, to investigate an Iranian man purporting to be a prominent Islamic cleric.
Sheik Mousselmani told The Australian yesterday the mystery cleric - who has been identified as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi on his website after appearing under the name Sheik Haron - was not a genuine Shia spiritual leader.
He said there were no ayatollahs - supreme Shia scholars - in Australia and none of his fellow spiritual leaders knew who Ayatollah Boroujerdi or Sheik Haron was.
"We don't know him and we have got nothing to do with him," Sheik Mousselmani said. "The federal police should investigate who he is. It should be their responsibility."
But it was the Australian media itself who introduced him publicly as an "Ayatollah" and the Australian government that vetted him and allegedly granted him political asylum. He was allegedly in contact with the UN and was used to stir up anti-Iranian sentiment in Australia. It is then highly suspicious that now both the Australian media and the Australian government appear to have no knowledge of who he is or where he came from.
For someone used as part of the West's anti-Iranian propaganda campaign, and who was granted political asylum into Australia, but who is now supposedly unknown to those who invited him in and used him, there is clearly more to the story of Monis/Boroujerdi - a story that may then offer insight into his latest performance. Perhaps most ironic of all is the fact that the "Iranian regime" he was used to demonize apparently did not kill his wife - instead, he himself is suspected of doing so.
Whatever the case is, Monis/Boroujerdi is certainly no "loan wolf terrorist." He, at best, is yet another Frankenstein of the establishment run amok after an abortive attempt to cultivate and use him to advance Western foreign and domestic policy. At worse, he is directly involved in an intelligence operation to further inflame division in Australian society and promote the long stalled war in Syria aimed at regime change there, before heading to Iran - the scorn of Monis/Boroujerdi.
An omnipresent all-invasive surveillance state that is constantly "blindsided" by terror attacks carried out by criminals and characters possessing extensive criminal records and who are well-acquainted with that state's law enforcement, media, and even government, is testament to the fact that such surveillance hasn't been and never was intended to serve the public's best interests nor to keep them safe - but rather another system of control and manipulation to allow true dangerous to human civilization to endure with impunity.
BANK MORTGAGE BUSINESS IS AN UNCONSCIONABLE SCAM
THE PROCESS STEP BY STEP
Borrower Signs the Bank's Loan Contract and Mortgage
Borrower's Signature transforms the Loan Contract into a Financial Instrument
worth the Value of the agreed Loan Amount
Bank Fails to Disclose to Borrower that the Borrower Created an Asset
Loan Contract (Financial Instrument) Asset Deposited with the Bank by Borrower
Financial Instrument remains property of Borrower since the Borrower created it
Bank Fails to Disclose the Bank's Liability to the Borrower for the Value of the
Bank Fails to Give Borrower a Receipt for Deposit of the Borrower's Asset
New Money Credit is Created on the Bank Books credited against the Borrower's
Bank Fails to Disclose to the Borrower that the Borrower's Signature Created
New Money that is claimed by the Bank as a Loan to the Borrower
Loan Amount Credited to an Account for Borrower's Use
Bank Deceives Borrower by Calling Credit a "Loan" when it is an Exchange for the
Bank Deceives Public at large by calling this process Mortgage Lending, Loan and
Bank Deceives Borrower by Charging Interest and Fees when there is no value
provided to the Borrower by the Bank
Bank Provides None of own Money so the Bank has No Consideration in the
transaction and so no True Contract exists
Bank Deceives Borrower that the Borrower's self-created Credit is a "Loan"
from the Bank, thus there is No Full Disclosure so no True Contract exists
Borrower is the True Creditor in the Transaction. Borrower Created the Money.
Bank provided no value.
Bank Deceives Borrower that Borrower is Debtor not Creditor
Bank Hides its Liability by off balance-sheet accounting and only shows its Debtor
ledger in order to Deceive the Borrower and the Court
Bank Demands Borrower's payments without Just Cause... Deception-Theft-
Bank Sells Borrower's Financial Instrument to a third party for profit
Sale of the Financial Instrument confirms it has intrinsic value as an Asset yet that
value is not credited to the Borrower as Creator and Depositor of the Instrument
Bank Hides truth from the Borrower, not admitting Theft, nor sharing proceeds of
the sale of the Borrower's Financial Instrument with the Borrower
The Borrower's Financial Instrument is Converted into a Security through a Trust
or similar arrangement in order to defeat restrictions on transactions of Loan
The Security including the Loan Contract is sold to investors, despite the fact that
such Securitization is Illegal
Bank is not the Holder in Due Course of the Loan Contract ...only the Holder in
Due Course can claim on the Loan Contract
Bank Deceives the Borrower that the Bank is Holder in Due Course of the Loan
Bank makes Fraudulent Charges to Borrower for Loan payments which the Bank
has no lawful right to, since it is not the Holder in Due Course of the Loan Contract
Bank advanced none of own money to Borrower but only monetized Borrower's
Bank Interest is Usurious based on there being No Money Provided to the
Borrower by the Bank so that any interest charged at all would be Usurious ...Thus
BANK "LOAN" TRANSACTIONS ARE UNCONSCIONABLE!
Bank Has No True Need for a Mortgage over the Borrower's Property, since the
Bank has No Consideration, No Risk and No Need for Security
Bank Exploits Borrower by demanding a Redundant and Unjust Mortgage
Bank Deceives Borrower that the Mortgage is needed as Security
Mortgage Contract is a second Financial Instrument Created by the Borrower
Deposit of the Mortgage Contract is not credited to the Borrower
Bank Sells the Borrower's Mortgage Contract for profit without disclosure or
share of proceeds to Borrower
Sale of the Mortgage Contract confirms it has intrinsic value as an Asset yet that
value is not credited to the Borrower as Creator and Depositor of the Mortgage
Bank Extorts Unjust Payments from the Borrower under Duress with threat of
Bank Steals Borrower's Wealth by intimidating Borrower to make Unjust Loan
Bank Harasses Borrower if Borrower fails to make payments, threatening Legal
Bank Enlists Lawyers willing to Deceive Borrower and Court and Exploit Borrower
Bank Deceives Court that Bank is Holder in Due Course of Loan Contract and
Bank's Lawyers Deceive and Exploit Court to Defraud Borrower
Bank Steals Borrower's Mortgaged Property with Legal Impunity
Bank Holds Borrower Liable for any outstanding balance of original Loan plus
Bank Profits from Loan Contract and Mortgage by Sale of the Loan Contract, Sale
of the Mortgage, Principal and Interest Charges, Fees Charged, Increase of its
Lending Capacity due to Borrower's Mortgaged Asset and by Acquisition of
Borrower's Mortgaged Property in Foreclosure.
Bank retains the amount of increase to the Money Supply Created by the
Borrower's Signature once the Loan Account has been closed.
Borrower is Damaged by the Bank's Loan Contract and Mortgage by Theft of his
Financial Instrument Asset, Theft of his Mortgage Asset, Being Deceived into the
unjust Status of a Debt Slave, Paying Lifetime Wealth to the Bank, Paying Unjust
Fees and Charges, Living in Fear of Foreclosure, and ultimately having his Family
Home Stolen by the Bank.
BANK MORTGAGE BUSINESS IS UNCONSCIONABLE
QUESTIONS and ANSWERS
Q: What is the basis of your Peoples Grand Jury action against the banks, and why
do you say that the banks are engaged in fraudulent and illegal practice?
A: Our statement of claim explains the lot, but essentially, when you go to the
bank to borrow money, they don't really lend you any money (or not the kind of
money that we can see, feel and touch such as gold or legal tender bank notes).
Not only do you not receive any money, but the "money" or "credit" that you
receive actually comes from you ... from the promissory note or commercial
instrument which you yourself "validate" by signing the document.
The bank takes this instrument which you just created (your own money) from
you and the bank deposits this money into your account.
They then make a ledger or computer entry into your account and claim they
loaned you the "money."You must first understand that "money" is only credit.It has no value in and of itself. it is only a licence to do something.
This is illegal because there is no law that empowers these corporations to create
money out of nothing. Only God can create something out of nothing.
In the above example, the money "loaned" to you by the bank actually came from
The bank provided no equity in the transaction; the bank never risked anything,
nor lost anything and never would have lost anything.
The bank was only supposed to keep your money (the promissory note) as
collateral, in case you default.
But what they do not tell you is that they took your promissory note or
commercial instrument and converted it for their own use by on selling it . They
unlawfully enriched themselves, and this is illegal.
Q Why do you say the money or credit comes from me?
A: Because that is the truth - the money, or the bank note that we have in
circulation today is nothing but a promissory note ... it is not real money, it is fiat
money ... a piece of "legal tender" paper ... that says the government owes us the
money, because after they took the gold out of circulation, there is really no
money left ... therefore there is nothing to pay our debts with !
All we have is the government's promise to pay - worthless lOUs that are not
backed with anything other than the government's coercive force, which dictates
to us that we have to accept this form of "legal tender fiat money" or we get
nothing for our labour.
The banks have no "credit", the credit comes from us. This credit is backed by our
labour, our ability to repay whatever we may borrow. In other words, our credibility.
But the banks, the lawyers, the accountants, and the debt collectors do not tell us
The banks lie to us each time we borrow money because they really do not lend
us any money ... whatever "money" they lend to us is ours to begin with as it did
not come from their vaults ... it was created as electronic or digital money.
Q: Where does the bank get the money to lend to their borrowers?
A: They use God's money ... money they create out of nothing, out of "air," ... they
have created an unlimited "money tree" ... made possible by gullible and trusting
people who are led to believe that they are lending us their own money ... or
money deposited by their clients in their cheque or savings account.
The banks really do not have any money or assets to lend.
Banking regulation does not permit the banks to lend their depositors' money.
Money is created each time a borrower signs a promissory note which is then
deposited into their account as "cash."It is done these days with a flick of a few computer keys. It has no other form of existence!
This cash value is then used by the bank to increase their book asset by the
amount that is equivalent to the loan.
It is not as though the bank had this money sitting in their vault waiting for
someone to come along and borrow that money.
The fact is, prior to the loan agreement, when we come to the bank to borrow
money, the money did not exist. Therefore the money had to come from
In the old days, when banking used to be honest and honourable, only those who
have money can engage in the business of lending money. That was when the
banking business used to operate just like any other business.
If the bank did not have the money, they have to get the money from the central
bank or another bank, rent the money at wholesale (low interest) and then lend
the money at retail (higher interest) to the borrower.
They couldn't create unlimited amounts of money like they do now. It is true,
banks were allowed to issue debt certificates, or notes, but these are really not
intended to be circulated as money.
In recent times, banks are no longer required to have money in order to lend
You might say: "duh?" ... Yes it's true, it's called the "fractional reserve" banking
This is because there is really no such thing as money. So when you want to
borrow money, you just go to one of these banks who does not have any money
to lend, and they'll create money on their CONputer, right in front of you, just like
Just sign a promissory note or loan application form and voila!
With one quick CONputer entry, you now have money sitting in your account!
Or the bankster issues a cheque payable to you, even though these cheques are
not backed by any currency or legal tender money.
OPEN LETTER TO TONY ABBOTT AND JULIE BISHOP.
STAY OUT OF IRAQ! YOU ARE COMMITTING A WAR CRIME!
direct threat to Australia,” and that you intend sending troops there to fight
on both your parts, or you are both stupid. We the people, on the other
hand, are not stupid. Iraq is not even the slightest threat to Australia, in any
This is absolute codswallop! The whole thing is stage-managed, to suck in
military equipment or aircraft, either to Iraq, Ukraine, or anywhere in the
middle east, as it is a ploy to drag Australia into another war (World War III)
as part of the ultimate program to establish a One-World Government (the
1. ISIS (now ISIL) was set up in the US in the first place, by way of deception –
2. Vladimer Putin, far from being the war-mongering demon that you and
your NWO fellow-Zionist puppets are making him out to be, is showing up
so far to be our best and strongest hope for the future. Since the fall of
communism in Russia in the early 1990’s, there have been some 30,000
new Christian churches built, plus the complete re-building of the Christian Russian Orthodox
Cathedral in Moscow, which Stalin had smashed to the ground.
He has removed most if not all Jews (who as you know, or should know,
were the main engineers of the Bolsheviks, and hate Christianity with a
passion) from positions of power in Moscow, and has put Russia back on a
firm Christian and economic footing, which the international banksters
hate! You might consider doing the same here, if you know how, which we
doubt. Your treasurer Hockey is showing to be a worse fumbler and bungler
Ukraine, and to avoid a major conflict. He has massive support from his
people in Russia, more than twice the support, percentage-wise, that you
have tried to make out. Iraq poses no threat to Australia whatsoever.
Moreover, it has absolutely no motive to do so. What is going on there is a
out of it. This is a plot by the Zionist elitist international banksters to drag
us into a conflict and start WWIII, which was planned long ago. Julie,
instead of going around the world repeating what you have been instructed
to say by your puppet-masters here, you might like to save tax-payers
money and stay home and do something that you understand – or should
your Rhodes Scholar Internationalist-Globalist puppet-master teachers, and
do what the people want you to do here in Australia. You are not doing that!
Re-establishing our own People’s Bank of Issue would be a start, as
Australia is virtually bankrupt! You are not even doing that! You must have
the guts to stop grovelling to, and doing the bidding of the internationalist
planned to do by the Zionist-CIA-Mossad One World Planners of course),
and it will result in more Australian soldiers and military men and women
being killed and sent back home in body bags, all for nothing, exactly as it
did last time Australia sent troops over there – also all for nothing! The
globalist Zio-international banksters are all laughing into their wines and
motto of Mossad, the Israeli Secret Services: “By Way of Deception, You
middle east, we have enough to do – and you have too – to save our own
World Government, with a Zionist-controlled central banking system. We
want Australia to remain the traditional Australia as it was – a Christian,
peace-loving nation of people, minding our own business, genuinely and
charitably helping people wherever we can, and serving our Christian God
Central Queensland Christian Free State, (Seceded 01-07-2004) on behalf of all peace-loving
The news of prominent wheat farmer and chairman of Rural Debt Roundtable working group, Rowell Walton, being placed into receivership reveals the irony of almost every Australian farmer and their debt with banks.
It also demonstrates the fragility of agriculture which depends on debt finance provided by often avaricious trading banks whose only social responsibility is to their shareholders.
Last Friday the ANZ bank sent in receivers Korda Mentha to take over Mr Walton’s four dress circle, black soil wheat growing properties in the Dulacca and Tara regions of the western Darling Downs.
Farm property values have seriously declined since the financial crash of 2008 and recent drought, which in turn eroded Mr Walton’s equity to loan ratio, making him, at least on paper, unviable, languishing with a $30 million debt.
For many years farmers and other rural interest groups have campaigned for the establishment of a national development bank that issues credit to primary industry at a minimum, low, fixed interest rate, in a similar mode to the original charter of the Commonwealth Bank. Low cost finance ensures food production security which is directly tied to the sovereignty of the nation.
Unfortunately the party duopoly is largely controlled by the financial and oil sectors and financial industry legislation drafted by the ALP/Liberal nexus over decades has always been in favour of the banks.
Seldom do individual farmers who have the fortitude to take on a bank, ever get a win in a court, and one only needs to hark back to the similar plight of Marlborough wheat farmer George Muirhead in the early 90’s
It should be noted that the Senate Inquiry into the establishment of the Australian Reconstruction and Development Board designed to buy toxic farm debt at a discount from trading banks has been reviled by Chairman of the Reserve Bank Glen Stevens and predictably by the Australian Bankers Association.
In fact in a veiled threat from the ABA in its submission to the Senate Inquiry, it promised to punish those borrowers with higher interest rates and other penalties should the ARDB be put into operation.
Total farm debt is said to be more than $66 billion which, in effect cannot be repaid even by the forced sale of every mortgaged property held in the banking industry portfolio.
We must set up the ARDB with its intended charter, not some watered down version acceptable to the banking industry and the ALP or Liberals.
I have been working closely with Mr Walton, Bob Katter and Dr Mark McGovern of the QUT Business School of Economics and Finance to ensure the ARDB is established.
Farmers don’t want more loans from the government or banks. They can’t pay off the huge burdens they have now! The ARDB presents the only way out for primary industries.
Dairy farmer and National Chairman, Katters Australian Party.
Will someone pleeeease get it into Craig Isherwood’s head that restoration of the American Glass Steagal Act is not the issue of primary importance here in Australia.
For a start, it’s an American Act, and as such has nothing to do with Australia.
Isherwood has long been hypnotised and mesmerised by that self-styled financial “expert” in the USA, Lyndon La La Land. He it was/is who has been pushing for the Glass Steagal Act to be re-introduced over there. This would – according to them - prevent speculation on the stock exchanges by the banks. Incidentally – or should I say, not so incidentally – Lyndon La La La Rouche is a former Trotskyite! Camouflaged of course! HELLO?
Whether it would or not, it would not stop speculation by corporations, and the privately owned banks, – being the devious and deceptive a* holes that they are, they would simply continue to speculate, operating through countless corporations, as they do now, all over the world, and make it almost impossible to trace. “Churning” on the stock market is one of the most parasitical and destructive practices that exist. Even the Federal Court has recently acknowledged this, and ruled accordingly.
Thus, replacing the Glass Steagal Act alone, would achieve nothing. Lyndon is still in la la land.
What is required, here in Australia, is:
- Prohibition of ALL speculation on public company shares.
2. This can easily be achieved by:
(a) shutting down all stock exchanges in Australia, (as well as Wall Street of course,)
(b) having each public company conduct its own share transactions – buying and selling – from their own offices.
(c) have a minimum time period on the selling of a shareholder’s shares, or portion of shares. Such a minimum period could be say, at least 12 months from the time they bought them – not 12 weeks, or 12 days, or 12 minutes, as exists today. This would get the churners and speculators and parasites out of the industry, and hopefully get them to do something constructive with their lives – like planting potatoes, milking cows, or other.
3. We MUST get our own Commonwealth and State banks back up and running. Owned by the people, and recognising the peoples credit, and creating and issuing the necessary funding, both for government projects, and for primary producers particularly, as debt-free credits, just as Sir Dennison Miller did many years ago, as the first governor of the Commonwealth Bank, and NOT as interest-bearing debts. This is NOT taught in universities, or anywhere, it has been given the “silent treatment,” and those politicians who are aware of it, dare not speak about it, or they would be in politics no longer. Bob Katter has admitted this. Abraham Lincoln did this also, with his Greenbacks. Kennedy was starting to do it also. HMMMM!
4. There are many more steps of course, but this would get the show on the road. In case any politician complains that they “do not have the funding,” this of course is nonsense. In Queensland alone, the State Government Superannuation Fund has tens of billions of dollars stashed away in accounts and savings all over the place. They would need to take only about ten percent of these funds, open their State Bank (as we used to have,) and deposit that amount in their bank. Even at the existing rate of 10 to 1 that banks operate on at present, in what is known as “orthodox finance,” the State Bank would easily have at least 100 Billion dollars to make available to issue DEBT-FREE, and pay out the existing money-changers, flog them out of the temple, save Queensland, and the graziers, farmers, rural industries, and Australian enterprises, as well as those on Struggle Street. It has been done before, but the money-changers shut that system down, bribing the politicians to do so. I have been informed that Peter Beattie and Anna Bligh received many tens of millions of dollars EACH, from the international banksters, to implement the policies they did, and bankrupt the State of Queensland. Their “payments” were and are, salted away in Switzerland and Austria. They also should be arrested and tried for treason.
5. To go on as they – the politicians - are going on at present, is also to commit treason.
6. The next step then would be to immediately recognise the “gap” that exists between prices and available purchasing power per any one unit of time. But that’s another, rather complex subject, for another day. The banksters don’t want you to know about that either. More business for them! At present, all money that comes into existence, does as as an interest-bearing debt to the banksters. However, only the capital is created, not the interest! How then can the loans ever be repaid, if the interest does not exist? Answer – they can’t. The banksters simply increase the loans to pay the interest, year after year, chortling into their vaults, so the only way the loans can be reduced under present rules is to sell assets. This if just what Nicholls and Newman are planning on doing, but they are holding “STRONG CHOICES” meetings around town, to make it look like they are “listening to the people.” However, what they are really doing is asking, “which path do you prefer us to follow – that of Lucifer, or Satan, or the devil?” Again, all very well camouflaged of course.
The penalty for treason is – wait for it - DEATH!
I’ve tried many years ago to get some sense into Isherwood, and the politicians, but to no avail. He is obviously brainwashed, and fixed in his mind.
We ask that every concerned person in Queensland - and Australia - insist to their member of parliament, that we again have our own banks. The only other alternative is bankruptcy, as they know, with the solution being the new World Order, which is global slavery for us all, under the total control of the money-changers.
Enough is enough! Time to bring back the death penalty. The recent murders of Daniel Morecombe, Sophie Collombet, Jill Meagher, among many others demonstrates our soft bleeding heart policy of pursuing rehabilitation instead of retribution is an absolute failure. Civilised society demands that those who take the lives of others break their contract with society for their own life security and should be put to death. Soft forms of punishment continually fail and are simply unacceptable in the 21st century. Any society that allows convicted murderers to walk the streets after ‘rehabilitation’ and enjoy their lives while their victims still rot in their graves and their relatives and friends live in misery is simply barbaric!! An eye for an eye!
Ivan Molloy (Dr)
3/22 Corsair Cres, Sunrise Beach, Qld, 4567